There are
many different forms of governments out there: dictatorships, monarchies,
democratic republics, aristocracies, etc. The United
States of America, for example, is described by the Central Intelligence Agency’s
website as a “constitution-based federal republic; strong democratic tradition.”
So
what makes one system of government better than the next? Is it how well the
various ethnic groups or religions are represented in the governing body? Or
perhaps, it is how much personal freedom each individual has that determines
which government is better. Many of us may say it depends on the average income
of the citizens.
The
“World Happiness Report” (which can be found here) lists Denmark as the 2016 world’s happiest country.
Index Mundi, which lists statistics on many different counties, however, lists Denmark at as having the 32nd highest
GDP in the world. Qatar, by the same reports, is listed at number 1 in regards
to GDP, and number 36 in happiness. Clearly, money doesn’t buy happiness, but
it does help.
I
say it the one true way to judge a government is by the types of lives its
people live. Truly, if the citizens of a nation are truly happy, what else
matters?
Take
a citizen living in a dictatorship in the New Floridian Order. She is told to
wear certain clothes, work a certain job, and live in a certain place. She also
doesn’t earn any money. How could she possibly be happy? Surely, the Northern
Virginia Democracy should step in, remove the dictator, and free this citizen
and all her peers from oppression.
But
what if she’s truly happy? The government told her to wear comfortable yoga
pants and a variety of colorful tee-shirts. She works a job that’s mentally
exhausting, but she has short hours and plenty of time to spend doing her
hobbies. She lives in a government-owned 3500 square foot home, where she goes
to a local government cafeteria and enjoys a choice of many delicious foods for
every meal. Her government also has eliminated currency, and provides the
citizens with everything they need.
Now,
that doesn’t sound too bad does it?! For having been told our entire lives how
terrible a dictatorship is, that almost seems like a dream come true. While I
grant you, it is indeed a fabrication, the point is: a government is not benevolent
or malevolent based on the system it uses. It is the people that corrupt it.
Let’s
look inward at the United States. Some Americans believe the US is the pinnacle
of freedom. To quote the great Miley Cyrus, “It's our party we can do what we
want. It's our party we can say what we want. It's our party we can love who we
want. We can kiss who we want. We can sing what we want.”
via GIPHY
via GIPHY
If
we have so much freedom, how are we not the happiest nation on Earth? We are 13th
on the list. Not bad, granted, and yet Israel, a nation constantly at war and
in danger of being wiped off the face of the map, is number 11.
A dictatorship in the wrong hands usually ends up going awry. Look at North Korea for example. Yet, with the right person in charge, it doesn't have to be that way!
The
point is, look beyond a system of government to what that government actually
does to its people. The right people in the right positions can make all the
difference in the world. People should be happy, not just “free.”
I really love what you're trying to say here. It's something that I don't think many people will want to talk, let alone think about . . . but it's something unarguably true. One form of government is not better than another, there is no "right" and "wrong," it's all relative. While we can be satisfied with what we have, there's no wrong in pondering alternatives.
ReplyDeleteWe're so entrenched in our ideas that democracy is the best, but we've only ever lived under democracy! We highlight the failings of other systems, yet so easily dismiss the benefits. Maybe the majority of America would be happier under communism, monarchy, or even a dictatorship. There have been well-loved dictators and monarchs, and hated presidents and congressmen. It's not the system, it's the people who run it.
You know what's really sad about all of this? The fact that in many cases women are already told what they cannot do (reproductive rights, equality in pay, glass ceilings, etc.) in America--just look no further than Ohio or Texas. But I wonder--is that what dictatorships actually look like? Venture no further than Saudi Arabia or North Korea, and while SA might not be specifically labeled a dictatorship, it's certainly a very strict, top-down monarchy that functions similarly, and where women are told what to wear, when they can leave the house, which jobs are acceptable, what they can eat, etc. Did either of those countries make it on the Happiness Index?
ReplyDeleteI agree with your overall point--there is some unknown quantity that goes beyond salary or wealth. And there are so many other factors involved--quality healthcare and education; safe living conditions; freedom of movement; and, of course, freedom of speech, which is limited here in America, so it's probably "Freedom-lite"?